%PDF-1.3 % endobj /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /CropBox [0 0 612 792] >> 0000001053 00000 n 22 0 obj <>/ExtGState<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI]>>/Tabs/S/StructParents 4>> 0000001299 00000 n We review de novo a trial court's decision to grant or deny summary disposition under <>/Shading<<>>/XObject<<>>/ColorSpace<>/ExtGState<>>>/Type/Page>> 4 0 obj >> First, Petitioner argues that it is GM and not Petitioner that is liable for payment of the tax. endobj endstream endobj startxref 3 0 obj stream endstream endobj 53 0 obj << /Filter /FlateDecode /Length 39466 /Length1 63100 >> stream MFk t,:.FW8c1L&9aX: rbl1 endobj PDF State of Michigan Court of Appeals /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] >> /Parent 4 0 R }I9U#bo-g*kzh$So&F}UL'!Y.HRy[r6MtQkj>lm9NBQlI";N4 _}yY=iz6m`L V+2Il[nopm =InMf4+5y&$L7O"3e/6mwEi(o}u << %%EOF >> /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] 243 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<485C7304AFF34342930E3CEC2115268E><8FA8B8C555CCBF4D97F3C39EB61B12D3>]/Index[237 13]/Info 236 0 R/Length 53/Prev 70905/Root 238 0 R/Size 250/Type/XRef/W[1 2 1]>>stream /Contents [118 0 R 119 0 R 120 0 R] /Type /Page 5 0 obj /Annots [] /Prev 239 0 R /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /Contents [101 0 R 102 0 R 103 0 R] endobj 0000000627 00000 n %PDF-1.5 % 0000001824 00000 n /Annots [] PDF STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS - State Bar of Michigan 15 0 obj endobj 43 0 obj 0000006151 00000 n Litigation Corner: What's a Motion for Summary Disposition or Motion D%X %L" 00128X /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] << /TrimBox [0 0 612 792] 54 0 obj HWrF}W#E b+K*.W9$@ R># R`3wE(XOP?i(&D,[vYM}xb?/G |gx E3d%a/E|:xm6"Qd\ 27?_dF|*AI{I_/x $ MCR 2.116 (C)(2) (amended eff 1/2/20). III. endobj /Font 244 0 R << trailer 16 0 obj <>stream /Annots [] << /Type /Page /Filter /FlateDecode /Annots [] hbbd``b`$g@9Hpj,Ft?? 20-000091-MM MICHIGAN SECRETARY OF STATE, JOCELYN BENSON, Hon. A motion for summary disposition may be based on one or more of these grounds, and must specify the grounds on which it is based: The court lacks jurisdiction over the person or property. /Type /Page x+ | RDM, the court stated: [T]his Court must consider not only the pleadings, but also any affidavits, /Title (Page 2) least in part based on the standard for summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(10). << /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /Resources 117 0 R >> PDF STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF CLAIMS - Brennan Center for Justice 23 0 obj /Count 37 /Next 48 0 R >> 0000000556 00000 n PDF S T a T E O F M I C H I G a N C O U R T O F a P P E a L S Summary disposition may be granted where "[t]he service of process was insufficient." MCR 2.116(C)(3). 47 0 obj << PDF STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS - State Bar of Michigan /CropBox [0 0 612 792] endobj >> /Contents [179 0 R 180 0 R 181 0 R] endobj This statute states that a motion for summary disposition is appropriate where the ". >> /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /Annots [] 7;nY%T/YL_bn-YJ]_7z^yp}|^^+eQuzv;U /Type /Page ~1)zfq(5Vy>. /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] 218 0 obj <>stream Michigan Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Disposition /CropBox [0 0 612 792] <<3F089A2F844EF54ABE25762D0C07D4D0>]>> MCR 2.116 (C)(4) (amended eff 1/2/20). /Annots [] > > Read More.. 5@)=[$.YrG[QM+ksEnuG_*QnD{?#rK~Nj.ByouVXM[WV{zP17`X9Yelw)X[z8obV:; ' *#(,VkBecO(d*=;oHY/7vg9Xw6{lR? QYkPz. >> %PDF-1.6 % At certain times in a lawsuit and depending upon which court the case was filed in, parties may file dispositive motionsmotions to dismiss, motions for summary disposition, or motions for summary judgment. Defendant argues that Plaintiff's claims actually . endobj Smith v Globe Life Insurance, 460 Mich 446, 454-455; 597 NW2d 28, 33 (1999). /Contents [146 0 R 147 0 R 148 0 R] /Parent 4 0 R Cynthia Diane Stephens Defendant. 0000000727 00000 n For the reasons set forth below, we affirm. PDF State of Michigan /Parent 4 0 R Civil Procedure. endobj 24 0 obj /Parent 4 0 R *1 J "6DTpDQ2(C"QDqpIdy~kg} LX Xg` l pBF|l *? Y"1 P\8=W%O4M0J"Y2Vs,[|e92se'9`2&ctI@o|N6 (.sSdl-c(2-y H_/XZ.$&\SM07#1Yr fYym";8980m-m(]v^DW~ emi ]P`/ u}q|^R,g+\Kk)/C_|Rax8t1C^7nfzDpu$/EDL L[B@X! >> /CropBox [0 0 612 792] endstream endobj 62 0 obj <> endobj 63 0 obj <> endobj 64 0 obj <>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]/ExtGState<>>> endobj 65 0 obj <> endobj 66 0 obj [/ICCBased 71 0 R] endobj 67 0 obj <> endobj 68 0 obj <> endobj 69 0 obj <>stream stream /TrimBox [0 0 612 792] << /Contents [167 0 R 168 0 R 169 0 R] 1cGkZS3`uZY*te_6bCMdC YvzvOmI)n:L(U{pnomT a(G6YbTbjdm3 k])x4cVPdEY (q8Kl ee+rv.,r1=#+zdJ&rL5BWcDhbP3pDE*\jgQ;7i$X>#c*}$c-^[tl8e a)b->x_ OCy9(;J6Gc /Type /Page %PDF-1.5 Michigan Ass'n of Home Builders v City of Troy, 504 Mich 204, 211; 934 NW2d 713 (2019). endobj /Prev 47 0 R xwTS7PkhRH H. /TrimBox [0 0 612 792] Ci0wMLA} /Contents [191 0 R 192 0 R 193 0 R] /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] affidavits. endobj endstream /Resources 104 0 R endobj % << {{{;}#tp8_\. endobj endobj PDF COA 360135 ERICA RUTH FISHER V CHAKIRA LEKEISH CALCOTE Opinion - Per 40 0 obj /TrimBox [0 0 612 792] << If the defendant actually receives service of process within the life of the summons, the fact that the manner of service was improper is not grounds for dismissal. at 119-120. /Length 241 0 R >> 0000005908 00000 n Summary Disposition3, p2) Petitioner makes several arguments as to why it should not be held liable for the assessed use tax and interest. 4 0 obj 0000000016 00000 n endobj While Michigan Courts have repeatedly held that snow-covered walkways and potholes are considered open and obvious separately, this case is distinct. %PDF-1.4 A party seeking summary disposition under this subpart is required specifically to identify those issues about which the party believes there are no disputed material facts and must submit affidavits, depositions, admissions, or other documentary evidence in support of the motion. >> Tips for Filing Interlocutory Appeals in the Michigan Court of Appeals 48 0 obj /First 8 0 R endobj /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /Producer (Corel PDF Engine Version 11.2.0.238; modified using iText 2.1.7 by 1T3XT) 19 0 R 20 0 R 21 0 R 22 0 R 23 0 R 24 0 R 25 0 R 26 0 R 27 0 R 28 0 R /Resources 108 0 R When the Debtor failed to appear for a court-ordered settlement conference, the state court entered a default order on August 4, 2009. >> aGM 7w(Ha]ao}DfJYNob[z~{qZMSa-}su?z; yq=3PkUPkSu/If\cM",^|!{o!.^7E=w'o*U>4 rQ'YOvO^7mwyHNO#0Icgh/[}XTmhy-[nQ07OT,E5,lEMvH; SS-ji\,+hOOn\nK+j^^ aisM+XW\(X;]S~sob_\(3mXt$0 A):PU?q\Su,X%KSYKUb)[tLb_J%gAB}:fLGJT[>,IYlkSBvJ4hr5[2j#7jEO;_v3t endstream endobj Can a motion to dismiss in lieu of answer be filed in Michigan? >> They wish to marry each other and would if Michigan law allowed them to do so. MCR 2.116 (C)(1) (amended eff 1/2/20). /Resources 88 0 R |e=+1C2gaX` 7#d]S18{&zLzq+F7 =v-Ik#AE^'#J@Ie9[Q(952,MBleCQ;)5P U'SkB5-sf@\LwvenFl 8bLNIUp0-,]#y-}T5dOt~ =FK ME0?\.g0VXO/qD 3VbFsl?uG*kYfC{XrIqR /Resources 52 0 R << << /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] >> PDF State of Michigan Court of Appeals /Parent 4 0 R /Type /Page endobj /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] See Slater v Ann Arbor Bd of Ed, 250 Mich App 419, 425-426; 648 Nw2d 205 (2002) (noting that summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(9) is appropriate only "when the << /TrimBox [0 0 612 792] /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] A motion for summary disposition is reviewed de novo. Rule 4.201 - Summary Proceedings to Recover Possession of Premises (A) Applicable Rules; Forms. Get any form from 85,000 legal documents including Michigan Defendant's Motion for Summary Disposition online with US Legal Forms. A motion under MCR 2.116(C)(7) is appropriate where there has been an "assignment or other disposition of the claim before commencement of the action." MCR 2.116(C)(7). >> /Parent 4 0 R /CropBox [0 0 612 792] mue#n.$eR,c8i!HRF_>q!9XNR,Kd$$GBR8EA}p"PWsL6=*;1:l )^%&~+e?F6x J#{, *SFi,P|M+Ctf>3{qbPTXp5Lyn,&u{~ Q/$__'{O(s 5>Ok /Annots [] N?a}!a. << %PDF-1.4 /Type /Page Motion, Exh. /Dest (_PAGE37) >> 0000001015 00000 n 0000000842 00000 n MCR 2.116(C)(10) (There is no genuine issue as to any material fact other than damages)May be file raised at any time, unless a period dispositive motions is established in which under a to scheduling order entered pursuant to MCR 2.401. /Contents [61 0 R 62 0 R 63 0 R] court lacks jurisdiction of the subject matter." MCR 2.116(C)(4). /Parent 3 0 R (a) At any time after a respondent's answer has been filed, the respondent or the Director may make a motion for summary disposition of any or all allegations contained in the Order Instituting Proceedings.If the Director has not completed presentation of his or her case-in-chief, a motion for summary disposition shall be made only with permission of the Administrative Law Judge. However, the written order granting defendants' motion for summary disposition does not explicitly state under which subrule the motion had been granted. << 30 0 obj Michigan's Secretary of State, summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(8) and (10) and dismissing all of plaintiff's claims. endobj endobj /Filter [/FlateDecode] The judge may schedule oral argument on the motion, where the attorneys will have to appear in court and verbally explain their position. 46 0 obj /Type /Page application/pdfCOA 331789 VAN BUREN CHARTER TOWNSHIP V VISTEON CORPORATION Opinion - Authored - Published 05/16/2017 /TrimBox [0 0 612 792] /Filter [/FlateDecode] Summary Disposition, Mich. Ct. R. 2.116 - Casetext endobj MCR 2.116 (C)(5) (amended eff 1/2/20). /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /Type /Page RDM Holdings, LTD v Continental Plastics Co, 2. the Michigan Court of Appeals addressed a motion for summary disposition filed under . /Contents [77 0 R 78 0 R 79 0 R] /Type /Page 31 0 obj /TrimBox [0 0 612 792] 49 0 obj <>stream endobj /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /Parent 4 0 R endobj 8 0 obj 0000002339 00000 n Both parties concede that summary disposition for lack of ripeness is properly considered pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(10), and even if the trial court erroneously granted 1 See Braun v Ann Arbor Charter Twp, 262 Mich App 154, 160; 683 NW2d 755 (2004) (expressly stating that summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(4) was proper when an Acrobat Distiller 11.0 (Windows); modified using iTextSharp 5.0.6 (c) 1T3XT BVBA; modified using iTextSharp 5.4.1 2000-2012 1T3XT BVBA (AGPL-version) Hearing At Least 28 Days After Service of Claim. In support of this argument, Petitioner states that it "did not collect or remit tax on its sales >> /Resources 60 0 R P#a}uy`r]Czju9}j)A[:_uJ+U qgj%7upIo7;FIgf9? /Type /Page (Id.) 20`% \:sKe%3:df`R7JW49h#Nu$qAh],ggemWcAN (_PAGE16) 209 0 R (_PAGE17) 210 0 R (_PAGE18) 211 0 R (_PAGE19) 212 0 R (_PAGE2) 213 0 R N,j1! 9 0 obj << endobj |t:0Gwk\ CJ;}1p"_;}Ja7(L"|f70J,9G$BKo1dgEi i:8x!m45Ok~\3{yV(lowP{>]P6062c0 WU?}|]IF!L&L}!,1KP8Id};Cy"3JO=x;W`sQ]gcF8-+G0rf9lALGyxB. In short, although the Michigan Court of Appeals will consider an appeal of a denial of summary disposition after a jury trial, such review in the Sixth Circuit is far more limited, available only in cases in which the summary judgment denial involves a "purely legal" issue. /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] >> 52 0 obj /TrimBox [0 0 612 792] These motions are filed with supporting papers called briefs (often very long and not brief at all) that explain the parties legal arguments and attach supporting evidence as exhibits. /TrimBox [0 0 612 792] Robertson v Blue Water Oil Co, 268 Mich App 588, 592; 708 NW2d 749 (2005). 0000001036 00000 n X_gUV}Y*!nKs$hJh]gWuwUbKQ^ACj7e kE98bQ,>nNPN8,HgqqHWg/].OX}>=;l#,EtFk2tK7q4Y2q'$ A motion must be signed by the party or attorney. 5 0 obj >> MCR 2.116(G)(1)(c) (amended eff 9/1/17). hUk0W=$P << /TrimBox [0 0 612 792] /TrimBox [0 0 612 792] stream ^ (:-/X_6N>O {g}Q[%{&Ee( SUMMARY DISPOSITION. 61 13 /Resources 149 0 R MCR 2.119 (A)(2) (amended eff 1/2/20). A request for dismissal without prejudice under MCL 600.2912c must be made by motion under Michigan Court Rules 2.116 and 2.119. 1 0 obj 2 0 obj /Resources 157 0 R 28 0 obj PDF STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS - Justia Law /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /Resources 178 0 R 17 0 obj MOTION FOR SUMMARY DISPOSITION Plaintiff first argues that the trial court erred by granting defendant's motion for summary disposition in regards to his claims for abuse of process and defamation. % endobj /Contents [93 0 R 94 0 R 95 0 R] Summary disposition is intended to protect courts and the parties from frivolous defenses and claims and defeat attempts to use formal pleading as a means of delay.5 Notably, MCR 2.116(C)(10) does not instruct a court to grant summary disposition by using words such as "shall" or "must," unlike the federal rule. 0000060399 00000 n 0000000732 00000 n Z K,pDG@mQ'B,sa9"9!ae Lv: /Type /Pages 27 0 obj 198 0 obj <> endobj /Parent 4 0 R endobj << 7$W6 z$nR#]#7! endobj The service of process was insufficient. /Dest (_PAGE36) endobj /TrimBox [0 0 612 792] (Plf. endobj /ITXT (2.1.7) endobj /Contents [162 0 R 163 0 R 164 0 R] /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /TrimBox [0 0 612 792] 24 0 obj << /Linearized 1 /O 26 /H [ 820 216 ] /L 107214 /E 85574 /N 7 /T 106616 >> endobj xref 24 19 0000000016 00000 n evidence conclusive weight and granted summary disposition in favor of Velardo under MCR 2.116(C)(9). MCR 2.116 (G) (1) (a) (i) indicates: (i) a written motion under this rule with supporting brief and any affidavits must be filed and served at least 21 days before the time set for the hearing. 39 0 obj 0000002154 00000 n /Resources 113 0 R /Contents [130 0 R 131 0 R 132 0 R] /Parent 4 0 R /Resources 56 0 R endobj The moving party must ascertain whether a contemplated motion will be opposed. Copyright RPCD Holdings LLC 2003-2023 exclusive of the text of government codes. 20-000096-MZ . Rule 2.116 - Summary Disposition (A) Judgment on Stipulated Facts. << (_PAGE11) 204 0 R (_PAGE12) 205 0 R (_PAGE13) 206 0 R (_PAGE14) 207 0 R (_PAGE15) 208 0 R G}L The grounds for summary disposition can be found at Rule 2.116 of the Michigan Court Rules and include, but are not limited to lack of jurisdiction; lack of standing; another action has been initiated between the same parties involving the same claim; the claim is barred because of prior judgment, statute of limitations, statute of frauds, or appeals an order from the trial court granting Michigan Health and Wellness Center ("Plaintiff") partial summary disposition. >> >> 0000000820 00000 n xZnw 7Ew>{r"e%A_k4rNv h\3|$7|#knNO|ipMEa=>=ys--S}>=9'?NOipy^5`~%3oxmpMMVJh8-)]-{,Z*=5!=$xup,V lqf|._aWZot5Oc+*ltFR{rF4l]hkmrA.,%&-LY\8,&|i]9c?s)%5mXn{4pRh;nE>LCe8}e9xVJaqpDfQomOyI[\V} MCR 2.116 (G) (1) (c) (amended eff 9/1/17). << {X$]qEawRp /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] >> The Diocese of Lansing and the Archdiocese of Baltimore moved for summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(7). Unless made during a hearing or trial, a motion must be in writing. % 11 0 obj endobj Hb```f``$20 P9 /Type /Page << O&n&PBy i%=!f=.F(3;-vk9=.# defendants' motion for summary disposition was rendered moot. /Next 7 0 R Copyright 2023, Foster Swift Collins & Smith PC, Read full October 2014 Agricultural Law Update. >> PDF State of Michigan Michigan Health and Wellness Center, LLC v Charter Township of Royal Oak, unpublished opinion per curiam of the Court of Appeals, issued March 2, 2023 (Docket . << /TrimBox [0 0 612 792] /CropBox [0 0 612 792] << /Filter /FlateDecode /Type /Page m9j&Y/?iTl8::jQ0Hs P4H0bb?8cCa'@aTgb`, qr xkoF{~Ir 8(~#]J3$%,opDkf=-kzu2*trrUbqy}]bx2]Y,ap(3#-^8z5X'YeJ',E+1yW3X1) r6X'}]fWUslr\Q]S9`,U,E'PCyfGrAcMk lNxn{SXzN4/_\ ~zb_m4KVbea A(ed8Akh#dmj>8Vqe|F;:*F~J|Ma=7:a:n]NeJILIO'eL$Q%x>2 :ay"sq#B$R- Vk>54gI ]?NziQ}k|]]6(":>L[P$H}Px0((ex :=**ajS&JSy|eFe <> hb```Tb, ,%D41=4X+vga uY2XXdg l " fk`l ,^=H-g`;)SeW+~@H10s y/r )8Z^?w|A=$;~j0>O amY!lW8wU(15nRhqN4^/U2N$NZ@YHN8. x,{#juXauNCAsMm@6+ yNUa]po-JiqG.u8nM`Ed?^AvvU /Resources 198 0 R << If competing requests for disposition are lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:57 Apr 14, 2023 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00072 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\17APN1.SGM 17APN1 << %PDF-1.7 << /CropBox [0 0 612 792] v Case No. With respect to her statutory duties and the Michigan Election Law, MCL 168.21 declares that the Secretary of State "shall be the chief election officer . %PDF-1.3 % Rule 2.119 - Motion Practice (A) Form of Motions. Rule 4.201 - Summary Proceedings to Recover Possession of - Casetext << 0000044648 00000 n endobj As a result, this Court reviews the record as if the motion for summary disposition was brought under MCR 2.116(C)(10). /Contents [49 0 R 50 0 R 51 0 R] 1 0 obj >> endstream endobj 199 0 obj <> endobj 200 0 obj <>/Font<>>>/Rotate 0/StructParents 0/Tabs/S/Type/Page>> endobj 201 0 obj <>stream MMy~gm The party asserting the claim lacks the legal capacity to sue. /Annots [] /Parent 4 0 R /Annots [] assignment or other disposition of the claim before commencement of action." In . /Names [(_PAGE0#SDU_40) 199 0 R (_PAGE0#_GoBack) 200 0 R (_PAGE0#sp_999_40) 201 0 R (_PAGE1) 202 0 R (_PAGE10) 203 0 R xb```f``)cBBk,o"we{00\/@u&NPbu`. /Contents [154 0 R 155 0 R 156 0 R] 18 0 obj /Annots [] (1) An application to the court for an order in a pending action must be by motion. /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] 2 0 obj In . A trial court may not make findings of fact or weigh credibility in deciding a motion for summary disposition. F9 )PAI\m1dO,( 48MT H(!%)+W0"`I%+BP6,za "SID86Z=x&'VR9Hc3?~ /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /Parent 4 0 R /Type /Page /Resources 141 0 R /Dest (_PAGE1) << /Type /Page SummaryDispositionTable See the Michigan Judicial Institute'sCivil Proceedings Benchbook, Chapter 4. /Parent 4 0 R /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /Contents [187 0 R 188 0 R 189 0 R] >> The judge's copy must be clearly marked JUDGE'S COPY on the cover sheet; that notation may be handwritten. /ModDate (D:20130815133913-04'00') /Parent 4 0 R >> A motion for summary disposition may be filed at any time consistent with subrule (D) and subrule (G)(1), but the hearing on a motion brought by a party asserting a claim shall not take place until at least 28 days after the opposing party was served with the pleading stating the claim. >> >> 19 0 obj 0000001789 00000 n endobj See MCR The judge's copy must be clearly marked JUDGE'S COPY on the cover sheet; that notation may be handwritten. /Type /Page A. Motions for Summary Disposition Under MCR 2.116(C)(10), a motion for summary disposition will be granted if the documentary evidence demonstrates that there is no genuine issue of material fact, and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. endobj Motion For Summary Disposition Michigan Sample - US Legal Forms /Annots [] /Annots [] However, the Michigan Supreme Court has provided that " 'the real-party-in-interest [defense] is not the same as the legal-capacity-to-sue defense.' " Cannon Twp, 311 Mich App PDF Opinion Regarding Collateral Estoppel Effect of State Court Judgment in endobj /Contents [171 0 R 172 0 R 173 0 R] /Parent 4 0 R /Annots [] << 39 0 R 40 0 R 41 0 R 42 0 R 43 0 R 44 0 R 45 0 R] /Parent 4 0 R PDF Under Michigan Court Rule 2.116(C)(10)? - State Bar of Michigan MCR 2.116 (B)(1) (amended eff 1/2/20). /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /Parent 4 0 R endobj (1995), the Court held that a motion for summary disposition for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted tests the legal sufficiency of a claim to determine whether opposing party's pleadings allege a prima facie case, and the trial court must consider all well-pleaded . 25 0 obj If one party files a motion, the other party will have a chance to file a written response. endobj endobj <>stream startxref >> /Resources 174 0 R 29 0 R 30 0 R 31 0 R 32 0 R 33 0 R 34 0 R 35 0 R 36 0 R 37 0 R 38 0 R ?4. 3 Respondent's Motion for Summary Disposition p. 3 . r"+YC4H CIIWPC a`SW97$m qG%*hrVz:> Q:&1.yY-oOYX1t7l(BLrjf v << PDF STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS - Justia Law 14 0 obj << endobj Defendant moved for summary disposition under both MCR 2.116(C)(7) and MCR 2.116(C)(10). endstream endobj startxref << /Type /Page A motion must state with particularity the grounds and authority on which it is based. VL! #5{|uS8eT$J>PCAhe@Z fzSca Rc27(PX@kD:>,}`mC#F=V}r=q}3[p^N7p7z@m$ya|h-*a`? endobj 3 0 obj 249 0 obj <>stream <> /Resources 133 0 R /Resources 186 0 R /TrimBox [0 0 612 792] >> << /CreationDate (D:20130814150131) /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /TrimBox [0 0 612 792] PDF State of Michigan Court of Appeals PDF PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY DISPOSITION - Michigan PDF Bay County, Michigan PDF Opposition response to defendant motion for sum disposition 44 0 obj << /Linearized 1 /O 46 /H [ 732 282 ] /L 99992 /E 58972 /N 5 /T 98994 >> endobj xref 44 14 0000000016 00000 n 7 0 obj -3- means that we review the legal issue independently, without required deference to the courts below." Wright v Genesee County, 504 Mich 410, 417; 934 NW2d 805 (2019). /Type /Page /CropBox [0 0 612 792] <>/Shading<<>>/XObject<<>>/ColorSpace<>/ExtGState<>>>/Type/Page>> 0000001183 00000 n /Contents [89 0 R 90 0 R 91 0 R] /CropBox [0 0 612 792] [/ICCBased 14 0 R] /Length 246 0 R Civil Procedure. Mich Court Rules Chap 2. >> >> << 38 0 obj H\U PG^ /!^2TDDD(%xkxxD#jtBV4krKJv^w_ xb $NNX. HWRX}W.i 0000002672 00000 n 34 0 obj >> /Type /Page endobj (y aW:frX$E|7-U7?#mR6EPA($47r_>zK|_pfuMnL=`n|W`b << << summary disposition, and attended a case evaluation mediation, the Debtor's attorney withdrew as counsel. /coR5dUH":___=:s./N8/ce*h*BZ\L#D0 \yFMr/:! /Parent 4 0 R h {w{a_2xj[7zW(I( q z^wz?ZgVz|4k3Gzfx]s;.bj[R@e&`$48S>}*M_`~,!p?m,U7kBe,"TD,?L>-Y~j_NpF'*[=,E2)EU:dCZ'o&7i2-p_+`(T*zG[-qB9!CW 'o-%`pM#"Kw-(XUw~Pp8 )PBBDwQnCMcT[ :VG*]\ MCR 2.116 (B)(1) (amended eff 1/2/20). /Parent 4 0 R 0000002715 00000 n /Annots [109 0 R] /Resources 125 0 R /Resources 76 0 R >> 0000002123 00000 n PDF State of Michigan /Resources 161 0 R These types of motions ask the court to decide the case without a trial based on the papers filed with the court. /TrimBox [0 0 612 792] A motion or response to a motion that presents an issue of law must be accompanied by a brief citing the authority on which it is based, and must comply with the provisions of MCR 7.215(C) regarding citation of unpublished Court of Appeals opinions. Most appeals in the Michigan Court of Appeals are appeals as of right after the entry of a final judgment or order. /Parent 4 0 R 0000000923 00000 n /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] 36 0 obj x+ | 2017-05-15T15:53:30-04:00PScript5.dll Version 5.2.22017-05-17T00:39:46-04:00 13 0 obj x%10+.q[$HD7.&sGcOfQllHT~)qP v#7L|"xufl6{vi8@WV Michigan Court Rule 2.116 (G) (4) further requires that the party seeking summary disposition must specify the issues for which it claims there is no genuine factual dispute. /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /Annots [] >> /TrimBox [0 0 612 792] Preparation of dispositive motions usually requires an attorney to spend time doing legal research to gather the law that applies to the facts of the particular case. /CropBox [0 0 612 792] <>/ExtGState<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI]>>/Tabs/S/StructParents 2>> The trial court granted summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(10) in favor of the Estate and defendant Tammy L. Bauer, personal representative of the Estate (collectively, "the Estate"), on the basis of laches and denying plaintiff's request that the judge recuse himself.
